# Cross-Domain Temporal-Coordination Opportunity Map — Phase 0R

## Result

This fresh-case pilot reports possibility, prediction, and distinctiveness as
separate outcomes. Both prospective selectors could choose any of the same 11
equal-nominal-drive policies.

### 1. Structured opportunity

- A temporal policy beat every non-temporal policy in
  **12/12** fresh cases.
- Mean best-temporal minus best-non-temporal score was
  **+0.038194**
  (case-bootstrap 95% interval
  **[+0.023110,
  +0.058856]**).
- FHN mean opportunity gain:
  **+0.019283**.
- LLG mean opportunity gain:
  **+0.057105**.

### 2. Prospective CCT opportunity prediction

The calibration-only opportunity score was the best temporal mean minus the
best non-temporal mean. It did not restrict policy access.

- Opportunity-sign accuracy:
  **12/12**.
- Pearson correlation with fresh held-out opportunity gain:
  **+0.988**.
- Spearman correlation:
  **+0.909**.
- CCT full-menu mean regret:
  **0.000000**.

### 3. Distinctiveness from domain-local calibration

- Domain-local full-menu mean regret:
  **0.001058**.
- Wins/losses/ties for CCT:
  **1/0/11**.
- Native-minus-CCT regret:
  **+0.001058**; positive favors CCT.

This comparison is tertiary. It cannot veto the structured-opportunity or
prediction findings.

### Numerical audit

- Compared selected policies at the nominal and half timestep in
  **13** records.
- Workflow-direction sign changes: **0**.
- Maximum absolute selected-policy score change:
  **0.000975**.
- Numerical decision audit: **PASS**.

## Advancement

Fresh-seed confirmation criterion:
**SATISFIED**.

## Claim boundary

A positive pilot establishes a model-level temporal-coordination possibility inside two declared standard equations and an equal nominal-drive action menu. It does not establish novel physics, hardware performance, or universal CCT superiority.
